在线词典,在线翻译

2011年7-8月gmat作文机经AA(至7.31)(六)

所属:其他考试 作者:cwf1986 阅读:1708 次 评论:0 条 [我要评论]  [+我要收藏]

小编摘要:海词为您收集GMAT机经,充足的准备是考G成功的最重要的一步。

11. 大致的意思是有人说,一些人选择在家工作的工作方式,而不是去固定的工作地点上班。作者认为有很多缺点:比如在家工作容易分心、缺乏职位提升的激励等,还有就是缺乏与人的沟通交流。

没有原题,上月JJ里的

V1.说和办公室稳定工作比起来,self-employed and work at home earn less in long run。理由有三个:一个是在家会有distractions from phone calls, noisy neighbors and household chords;另外一个是self-employed的人with no set schedule,因此会avoid working,有另外一个单词不懂,哼唧~,大概就是说工作起来就不主动吧;第三个是说会socially and professionally isolated,因此会丧失很多其他工作机会。

V3.it is financially unwise for people working at home。Author给了三点理由,第一,家里各种noisy neighbor, telephone call什么的会打扰到你;第二,在家里工作的人没有schedule;第三,在家会socially &professionally isolated,所以不能career advancement。Therefore,作者总结,对long-tern 在家工作earning less money than在办公室工作。

感谢athue提供的思路:

我从三个方面来说的:

第一,无理假设,no evidence is stated in the argument so support that在家工作的人没schedule和会有很多distraction打扰到你。

第二,忽略他因,作者没有考虑到career advancement的其他原因,只说员工如果不professional的话,那就没有career advancement。

第三,没有全面考虑有关earning的多个方面,即使在office工作可能收入会高一些,但是员工的成本也高啦,比如transportation fee。

12. No.53 The following editorial appeared in the Elm City paper.

 “The construction last year of a shopping mall in downtown Oak City
was a mistake. Since the mall has opened, a number of local businesses have closed, and the downtown area suffers from an acute parking shortage, and arrests for crime and vagrancy have increased in the nearby Oak City Park. Elm City should pay attention to the example of the Oak City mall and deny the application to build a shopping mall in Elm City.” (52)(两个版本,此为较新版本)53. Elm城的报纸上的社论: 
去年在橡树城市中心修建购物中心是个错误。由于中心开业,大量的本地企业倒闭了。而且市中心受到严重缺乏停车位的困扰。在附近的橡树城公园拘捕的罪犯和流浪汉也增加了。榆树城应该注意橡树城购物中心的例子并防止在榆树城建立购物中心。

没有这道新题的范文,下面先附上老版本的题目和范文

“The construction of last year of a shopping mall in downtown Oak City has done little for the residents of the community. Since the mall has opened, a number of local businesses have closed, and the downtown area suffers from an acute parking shortage. In addition, because the mall’s owner lives in nearby Elm City, the profits derived from sales at the mall are not being returned to the community. These problems, coupled with the increase in trash and litter in nearby Oak City park, demonstrate that Oak City did not use good judgment in allowing the construction of the mall in the first place.”(老题)

In this editorial the author rebukes Oak City for allowing the construction of a new downtown shopping mall. Citing a number of problems that have occurred since the building of the mail, the author concludes that the residents of Oak City have not benefited from the mail and that Oak City exercised poor judgment in allowing the mail to be built. Among the problems cited by the author are the closure of local businesses, lack of parking in the downtown area, and increased trash and litter in a city park near the mall. Moreover, the author argues that profits derived from sales are not benefiting Oak City because the owner of the mall lives in another city. The author’s argument is problematic in several respects.

In the first place, the author assumes that addition of the new mall is the cause of the various problems cited. The only evidence offered to support this claim is that the construction of the mall occurred before these problems manifested themselves. However, this evidence is insufficient to establish the claim in question. A chronological relationship is only one of the indicators of a causal relationship between two events.

In the second place, the author has focused only on negative effects the mall has had on the city. A more detailed analysis of the situation might reveal that the positive benefits for the city far outweigh the problems on which the author focuses. For example, new jobs might have been created for the residents of Oak City, and tax revenues might have been increased for the city. Lacking a more comprehensive analysis of the impact of the mail on Oak City, it is presumptuous on the part of the author to conclude that Oak City’s decision to allow the mall to be built was incorrect.

In conclusion, the author’s argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to demonstrate that the construction of the mall caused the various problems mentioned. The author would also have to show that the negative effects of the project outweighed the positive effects.

上月LZ的新题思路:1.中心开业与本地企业倒闭之间没有必然的因果关系(causal oversimplification)

2.罪犯和流浪汉的增加可能是因为其他原因,比如失业率的上升。。。(感觉和第一点有点重复。。。)

3.缺乏停车位和中心的建立无关,问题可能本来就存在或者是车增加了

0
2011-10-29 18:08 编辑:cwf1986
分享到:
关注海词微博:
发表评论:
表达一些您的想法吧!已有0条评论>>
登录,再发表评论
文明上网,理性发言!
您可能还感兴趣的文章:
  • [其他考试]美国大学GRE和GMAT要求

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology GRE: 1353 GMAT:720   Stanford University (CA) GRE: 1354 GMAT:720   University of California–Berkeley GRE: 1353 GMAT:707   Georgia In
  • [其他考试]【考试介绍】GMAT考试介绍

    GMAT考试是美国管理专业招收研究生委员会主办和负责指导的考试, 其英文全称是Graduate Management Admission Test。GMAT考试的科目包括会计学、经济学、管理学、普通管理、生产管理、行政管理、
>>精华推荐阅读
热门评论文章