在线词典,在线翻译

2011年7月gmat作文机经AI(至7.12)(一)

所属:其他考试 作者:cwf1986 阅读:2171 次 评论:0 条 [我要评论]  [+我要收藏]

小编摘要:海词为您收集GMAT机经,充足的准备是考G成功的最重要的一步。

1.

V1: issue是 constant innovation and change 能为企业带来improvement的同时也会带来一样damage   
用的 as  as 结构 具体不记得了  improvement在后面一个as后的  就一句话 
自己也就分improve和damage两个方面写应该也还好完成吧

感谢chenr523

V2:.AI: the constant innovation and change within an organization is as likely to damage the organization as to improve it.

感谢jerryzx

题库原题:Constant innovation and change within an organization are as likely to damage the organization as they are to improve to it.

感谢racy616

考古:

V1Innovation and changes are as likely do damage to an organization as do good to it. 大意就是创新和变化能够给一个组织带来的不良影响并不比好的影响少。

V2Constant innovation and change within an organization are as likely to damage the organization as they are to improve it.

提供观点:

1.We are living in a world which is developing at a termendous speed which requires constant innovation and change.
2.However, constant change and innovation can do harm to the organization if we can not adapt the organization to the innovation and changes.
3.Innovation and change is a double-edged sword. We should quickly adjust ourselves to the innovation and change and make them better serve us.

LZ思路:文章主体应该是倾向于innovation的。

(1)市场竞争激烈,只有不断创新才能持续发展,使公司在全球化的市场中生存下来

(2)不断的创新可以降低成本,提高产品质量,吸引更多的消费者,获得更高里利润

(3)当然,创新的成本也是比较高的,有时可能会带来一些负面影响(比如失败的可能性)但是不能因为有可能失败就不去创新。

 

2.issue是问是否groups and organization的authorities and responsibilities 分给每一个人可以更好的完成工作

感谢gmat新手22

V2. 企业的责任应该由团队来承担,给一个人过于集中的权利和责任是不好的

V3. 有人认为现在商业中过于强调团队,问这种想法对不对。

V4。AI: decision made by group vs. authority decision

题库原题:5. “All groups and organizations should function as teams in which everyone makes decisions and shares responsibilities and duties. Giving one person central authority and responsibility for a project or task is not an effective way to get work done.” 

提供观点:

1.     For groups and organizations that are stable, it is reasonable to have a flat organizational structure.

2.     For groups and organizations that are always confronted with emergencies, it is always better to give one certain person central authority and responsibility.

3.     It is hard to say that one structure is necessarily better than the other. They all have advantages and disadvantages. And it is a case-by-case discussion.                                             

1, Admittedly, 在团队中,每个人都应该起到积极的作用take positive action。责任和义务的share可以激发每个人更加主动motivate the members’ creativity and initiative. 比方说,many companies let the employees to buy shares and stocks.

2, 但是,这样不是说,everyone should be given the power to make the final decision. 首先,天性是自私的。In many circumstances, the personal goal may be different from or even contrary to the goal of the group. 如果任由每个人作出决定,很可能作出相反的,产生很多矛盾。incompatible conflict. 比如企业中,每个员工都想争取最多的工资,但也许与企业cost-cutting policy想矛盾。

3, 这时候,就需要one person with the authority and responsibility for a project来协调assort with the different interests。synthesize the various voices of all the group members and make the final decision.这样才能有效地领导一个团队,不会偏离最初的目标stray from the initial goal of the task.

范文:

Which is a more productive method of performing a group task: allowing all group members to share in the decision making, duties and responsibilities, or appointing one member to make decisions, delegate duties and take responsibility? The speaker’s opinion is that the first method is always the best one. In my view, however, each of these alternatives is viable in certain circumstances, as illustrated by two very different examples.

A jury in a criminal trial is good example of a group in which shared decision-making, duties, and responsibility is the most appropriate and effective way to get the job done. Each member of the jury is on equal footing with the others. While one person is appointed to head the jury, his or her function is to act as facilitator, not as leader. To place ultimate authority and responsibility on the facilitator would essentially be to appoint a judge, and to thereby defeat the very purpose of the jury system.

By way of contrast, a trauma unit in a hospital is a case in which one individual should assume responsibility, delegate duties and make decisions. In trauma units, split-second 【split-second: adj.瞬间发生的】 decisions are inherently part of the daily routine, and it is generally easier for one person to make a quick decision than for a team to agree on how to proceed. One could argue that since decisions in trauma units are typically life-and-death (adj. 生死攸关的, 重大的) ones, leaving these decisions to one person is too risky. However, this argument ignores the crucial point that only the most experienced individuals should be trusted with such a burden and with such power; leaving decisions to inexperienced group members can jeopardize a patient’s very life.

In conclusion, I agree that in some situations the best way to accomplish a task is through teamwork-sharing responsibility, duties and decision making. However, in other situations, especially those where quick decisions are necessary or where individual experience is critical, the most effective means is for one individual to serve as leader and assume ultimate responsibility for completing the job.

正在加载单词列表...
0
2011-09-10 18:44 编辑:cwf1986
分享到:
关注海词微博:
发表评论:
表达一些您的想法吧!已有0条评论>>
登录,再发表评论
文明上网,理性发言!
您可能还感兴趣的文章:
>>精华推荐阅读
热门评论文章